Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheiss Missgeburt
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete. Either a hoax. Or a non-notable bio. Either way, it's a speedy. Robdurbar 15:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested by creator of the page. I has also tagged it as a potential hoax. My original prod rationale was
- Seems doubtful. The creator claims that his sources are from Google searches. Yet searching "Scheiss Missgeburt" with "Tangerine dream" or with "Kluster" or with "Acon" or with "Michael Thomas Roe" or with "Rodelius" all come up empty.
I'd like to add that (as far as my German allows me to go) "Scheiss Missgeburt" means "shit miscarriage". Not an improbable name for a provocative artist but still sounds hoaxalicious. Even more funny is the new picture added: Recall that this artist is supposed to be born in 1937. This picture is most clearly taken with a digital camera... Pascal.Tesson 15:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article is ok --Juookdf 15:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Says the sockpuppett. Pascal.Tesson 15:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if not hoax, appears to be of little note with nothing meeting WP:BAND and not even an assertion in the article of something that would meet that guideline. No listing at allmusic; nothing selling at Amazon no Google hits for artist and alleged titles; unsourced; and the editor's flailing about vandalizing the nominator's talk page and removing the afd tags, plus his well reasoned response here has all the hallmarks of the childish hoaxer.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.